Utilities’ climate goals have little impact on emissions

Executive Editor

Cipher is proud to make our journalism free for all to read and republish. Unless otherwise noted, you may republish our articles for free as long as you abide by our Creative Commons license and the following terms: 

  • Credit Cipher and any co-reporting partners. In the byline, we prefer “Author Name, Publication(s).” At the top of the text of your story, include a line that reads: “This story was originally published by Cipher.” You must link the word “Cipher” to the original URL of the story.
  • If you’re republishing online, you must link to the URL of this story on ciphernews.com, include all of the links from our story and use our PixelPing tag.
  • If you use canonical metadata, please use the Cipher URL. For more information about canonical metadata, refer to this Google SEO link.
  • You can’t edit our material, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and editorial style. (For example, “yesterday” can be changed to “last week,” and “Portland, Ore.” to “Portland” or “here.”
  • For questions or help, please email [email protected] with the subject line: “Republishing.”
<header><h1>Utilities’ climate goals have little impact on emissions</h1><a href="" rel="author"></a><span class="title"></span><time rel="pubdate" datetime="2022-02-09T00:00:00-05:00">Feb 9, 2022</time></header><div><p>U.S. carbon dioxide emissions would be 12% lower by 2050 if electric utility companies achieve their climate goals compared to a business as usual scenario, according to <a href="https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/corporate_goal/?utm_source=hs_email&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;_hsenc=p2ANqtz-82JrgxMxEH0-OU51x8dYWClP9OFQOpmCBnzNXU2o0G_uM4opVPz_yZ5iTmVvTR2thbUQgg" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-ac-default-color="1" data-hs-link-id="1">a new report</a> by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).</p><p>Utilities have been at the forefront of a corporate-wide move in pledging new goals to slash carbon emissions. But many of these goals lack integrity, according to <a href="https://newclimate.org/2022/02/07/corporate-climate-responsibility-monitor-2022/?utm_source=hs_email&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;_hsenc=p2ANqtz-82JrgxMxEH0-OU51x8dYWClP9OFQOpmCBnzNXU2o0G_uM4opVPz_yZ5iTmVvTR2thbUQgg" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-ac-default-color="1" data-hs-link-id="0">a new study</a> by the NewClimate Institute.</p><p>Although 12% isn’t nothing, it’s also a far cry from zero emissions, which is where the <em>entire </em>U.S. economy needs to be by 2050 if the world is to meet goals in line with the Paris Climate Agreement.</p><p>That limited emissions reduction reflects the fact that although corporate goals are important, more systemic change is needed, likely prodded by government policy.</p><p>Overall CO2 emissions from the energy sector would be just 3% lower by 2050 with these corporate goals achieved.</p><p>Such a small reduction reflects the fact that the electricity sector accounts for just <a href="https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions?utm_source=hs_email&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;_hsenc=p2ANqtz-82JrgxMxEH0-OU51x8dYWClP9OFQOpmCBnzNXU2o0G_uM4opVPz_yZ5iTmVvTR2thbUQgg" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-ac-default-color="1" data-hs-link-id="0">a quarter</a> of U.S. emissions.</p><p>A primary factor driving the 12% reduction in electricity emissions is utilities’ plans to keep operating nuclear power plants.</p></div><p><div class="pullquote"><div role="separator"><svg width="64" height="20" viewBox="0 0 64 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M18.2915 4.9476L1.15253 14.8428"/><path d="M29.4302 4.9476L12.2912 14.8428"/><path d="M40.5693 4.9476L23.4304 14.8428"/><path d="M51.708 4.9476L34.569 14.8428" /><path d="M62.8472 4.9476L45.7082 14.8428"/></svg></div><blockquote><span>This outcome occurs in part because our model identifies existing nuclear generation as being among the lowest-cost options for meeting clean energy or carbon-reduction goals. Existing nuclear plants typically have operation and maintenance costs that are less than the cost of building new low-carbon capacity.</span><footer>U.S. Energy Information Administration</footer></blockquote><div role="separator"><svg width="64" height="20" viewBox="0 0 64 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"><path d="M18.2915 4.9476L1.15253 14.8428"/><path d="M29.4302 4.9476L12.2912 14.8428"/><path d="M40.5693 4.9476L23.4304 14.8428"/><path d="M51.708 4.9476L34.569 14.8428" /><path d="M62.8472 4.9476L45.7082 14.8428"/></svg></div></div><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></p><p>The reference case EIA is comparing the corporate goals against reflects current laws and regulations, including state-level mandates for renewable and zero-emitting electricity.</p><div></div>
Utilities’ climate goals have little impact on emissions

by  - 

February 9, 2022



U.S. carbon dioxide emissions would be 12% lower by 2050 if electric utility companies achieve their climate goals compared to a business as usual scenario, according to a new report by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).
Utilities have been at the forefront of a corporate-wide move in pledging new goals to slash carbon emissions. But many of these goals lack integrity, according to a new study by the NewClimate Institute.
Although 12% isn’t nothing, it’s also a far cry from zero emissions, which is where the entire U.S. economy needs to be by 2050 if the world is to meet goals in line with the Paris Climate Agreement.
That limited emissions reduction reflects the fact that although corporate goals are important, more systemic change is needed, likely prodded by government policy.
Overall CO2 emissions from the energy sector would be just 3% lower by 2050 with these corporate goals achieved.
Such a small reduction reflects the fact that the electricity sector accounts for just a quarter of U.S. emissions.
A primary factor driving the 12% reduction in electricity emissions is utilities’ plans to keep operating nuclear power plants.













This outcome occurs in part because our model identifies existing nuclear generation as being among the lowest-cost options for meeting clean energy or carbon-reduction goals. Existing nuclear plants typically have operation and maintenance costs that are less than the cost of building new low-carbon capacity.
U.S. Energy Information Administration











 
The reference case EIA is comparing the corporate goals against reflects current laws and regulations, including state-level mandates for renewable and zero-emitting electricity.