Source: Eurostat, Eurogas, Bruegel • Primary consumption measures total domestic energy demand, while final consumption refers to what end users actually consume. Original unit of measurement is in terawatt hours.
Industry uses natural gas mostly for chemical and petrochemical sectors, and to make aluminum and steel.
At the residential level, millions of Europeans rely on natural gas for heating and cooking. On average, gas provided 40% of space heating, 40% of water heating and 30% of energy used for cooking in the EU’s households in 2019,
according to the EU’s official statistical body Eurostat.
Those numbers diverge widely at the country level. For example, 96% of the gas used in households in Greece goes to space heating, 85% in Belgium, 59% in Romania and only 3% in Portugal.
Let’s look at the aforementioned two data points of natural gas share of the energy mix and gas imports for Germany versus Belgium.
Natural gas covers 26% of Germany’s energy mix, and 89% of that is imported—with
more than half of that coming from Russia.
In Belgium, gas also makes up 26% of the energy mix and all of it is imported, but only about 3.5% comes from Russia.
This juxtaposition shows Germany would be in a bind if Russia cuts off its gas exports, but Belgium would be mostly unaffected. News reports earlier this month indicated German officials
are preparing for a worse-case scenario.
Estonia and Finland import all the gas they need from Russia, yet the fuel only represents 8% and 7% respectively of their energy mix.
Energy systems in Scandinavian countries are generally more electrified than other parts of Europe, mostly due to an abundance and faster uptake of renewable energy. The EU’s average gas consumption is as much as tenfold the electricity consumption of Nordic countries, according to Finnish energy company
Fortum.
The European Commission, together with the capitals most vulnerable to a disruption, have secured contracts from global suppliers like the United States and Gulf countries that could help ease the blow in case of a full disruption. Diversifying energy imports is also a key pillar of the REPowerEU plan.
Former EU policy officials
have argued that finding alternative gas supplies and building more gas infrastructure will slow down the incentive to use the crisis as a trampoline towards a cleaner future and put the EU’s climate goals at risk.
Commission plans do include increasing the share of cleaner alternatives, such as renewable hydrogen, boosting the EU’s renewable energy and energy savings goals and making permitting for renewable projects easier.
A
report out this week commissioned by Breakthrough Energy argues the EU this decade needs to spend the equivalent of what it would on oil and gas (€800 billion, or $842.7 billion) to add more grid infrastructure for renewables, long-duration storage, clean hydrogen and sustainable aviation fuel to achieve that goal.
Another
report earlier this month from NGO Climate Action Network Europe found that clear targets for better insulating homes, installing energy-efficient heat pumps in homes and adding more solar PV rooftops can help the bloc ditch Russian gas without increasing its import dependency on other countries by 2025.
These are all for the medium term, however.
In the short term, the EU’s most powerful protection—and probably the less enticing one—is to simply save energy and curb demand. Both the European Commission and the International Energy Agency
are encouraging consumers to us less energy as a key point in reducing reliance on Russian gas.
The Italian government, for example,
recently decided to ramp up contingency plans: It will force the air conditioning in public buildings like schools and government ministries to be turned down this summer, while also setting a limit to the heating systems for next winter.
Editor’s note: Breakthrough Energy supports Cipher.
