View in browser
cipher-logo
FEB 2, 2022

 

Hello!

Today’s column is about time, the thing that keeps everything from happening at once, as someone wisely said.

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.

Send your energy photos, ideas and more to news@ciphernews.com or me directly at amy@breakthroughenergy.org.
b89741c2-d2fc-4b6a-a732-b14bc00d1ecb

HARDER LINE COLUMN

Why the government needs to speed up our energy transition

 
BY: AMY HARDER

The world is embarking on something it’s never done before: swapping one type of energy for another.

Yes, the world’s energy mix has evolved over time. To summarize almost 200 years of the developed world’s energy history in 20 words: Wood came first, and then coal was king, and now oil and natural gas are dominating energy consumption today.

“But those were all additions in time of great demand growth,” said Ernest Moniz, former energy secretary under President Obama who leads a nonprofit called the Energy Futures Initiative. “Now we’re talking about a displacement, and that’s a lot tougher transition.”

Earlier transitions happened over the course of 50 years or more. Today, we’re up against an unwavering clock, one that moves too slowly for politics but too fast for our ingrained energy system: a warming planet.

To ward off the most catastrophic impacts of climate change, scientists agree the world needs to drastically reduce greenhouse gas emissions from 51 billion tons a year today to essentially zero by 2050.

Instead, we’re running in the opposite direction. Emissions rose to a record high last year, thanks to the economy rebounding around the pandemic.

A planet warming at an unprecedented pace combined with the corresponding need for an unprecedented energy transition requires government action unlike we’ve seen before.

The recently enacted $1.2 trillion infrastructure law directed some $115 billion into climate change and clean energy programs, surpassing what was at the time the record-breaking amount of $90 billion in the 2009 Recovery Act.

That was more than a decade ago, and climate change is a cumulative problem. The longer we wait to address it, the bigger the problem becomes.

The House-passed Build Back Better Act (BBB) would pour an unprecedented $550 billion into this area, largely creating or expanding tax credits to spur more clean energy technology development.

Some lawmakers, including Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), whose vote is critical for passage of any major bill, supported the infrastructure law but not the BBB as the House passed it. Manchin has at times expressed support for many of the climate provisions—suggesting those could pass on their own—but he’s also demurred about speeding up the transition.

“The energy transition my colleagues seek is already well underway in the United States of America,” Manchin said in a statement in mid-December when expressing his opposition to the $1.7 trillion measure.

Yes, the transition is underway, thanks to a mix of public and private market actions over the past couple of decades. But it’s not moving fast enough for our warming planet—or to keep America competitive with other countries on new technologies.

“When the U.S. doesn’t lead, it’s not that the world doesn’t move forward, it’s just that other countries lead,” said Rep. Sean Casten (D-Ill.), whose career includes 30 years in the clean energy industry.

The $320 billion worth of tax credits on everything from renewable electricity to carbon-capture technologies in the House-passed BBB are essential to speed up the transition, Moniz says.

See below for four charts on this.

"The deployment of clean energy has got to be made much more investable. The tax credits provide incentives for private capital to come in. For this decade, those incentives are huge. Eventually, we’ll need something like a carbon price.”
- Ernest Moniz, nuclear physicist and former energy secretary

A price on carbon emissions would help counteract the subsidies fossil fuels have been receiving for decades, but Congress hasn’t supported either a carbon price or removing subsidies.

“Those subsidies are hard to repeal because so many of my colleagues represent people who depend on those subsidies,” Casten said. “But the minute you build a clean energy industry, you are also building a new constituency.”

It remains uncertain whether Congress will pass a slimmed-down policy with the $320 billion worth of tax credits, but the politics backing climate policy are intensifying.

Citing extreme weather, nearly two dozen House Democrats gearing up for tight reelection races in the fall sent a letter Monday to President Biden urging him to prioritize passing the climate provisions from the BBB.

“As the deadly and devastating consequences of the climate crisis made clear throughout 2021, the time for transformational climate action is right now,” states the letter, organized by Rep. Mike Levin (D-Calif.).
4ac2c647-2ed2-4082-bad8-ae29dfee3666

Amy’s Lunchtime Reads and Hot Takes

Hedge fund short sellers take aim at green energy stocks — Financial Times (paywall)
My take: The short seller saying that cleantech companies won’t fare well just because they’re doing something morally good seems a little short-sighted, which I guess is on brand. This is a long game though, so short sellers need not apply anyway.

BP claims EV charging stations ‘on the cusp’ of being more profitable than gas pumps — electrek
My take: Tipping points like these will help the clean energy transition accelerate, but I would like to know more about the actual prices of gas and electricity here; the skyrocketing electricity rates in Europe must be having an impact.

Sylvera takes $32M to build trust in carbon offsetting ratings — TechCrunch
My take: Verifying the carbon offset market will be critical (as we wrote last week), but I wonder if there are competitors to this type of thing.

Pumped hydro grid storage could be poised for a comeback — Canary Media
My take: Aw pumped hydro, an oldie but goodie! According to one expert quoted, permitting is not the biggest challenge to pumped hydro storage—it’s finding customers. That’s interesting given the permitting challenges facing most clean energy projects these days.

Meet Willow: Bidens (finally) welcome first cat to White House — ABC News
My take: Not everything I read is about climate!

More of what we're reading:

  • What it takes to turn climate action into climate impact — Breakthrough Energy's 2022 outlook
  • EU wind and solar push not enough to limit global warming as coal use remains stubborn — Financial Times (paywall)
  • After selling two software start-ups for over $1 billion, founder turns his focus to green hydrogen — CNBC
  • Here’s why one solar industry veteran is betting big on clean hydrogen — CNBC
  • Lakshmi Mittal transformed steelmaking. Can his son do it again? — The Economist

DATA DIVE

Visualizing the deployment gap in cars, carbon and more

9e696969-dc3b-4a74-b174-8e2c4f80d9cf

Source: Rhodium Group

The climate provisions of the Build Back Better bill would give a boost of anywhere between 39% and 75% in key clean energy technologies, according to data by Rhodium Group, an independent research group.

Compared to current policy, which includes the recently enacted $1.2 infrastructure law, the Build Back Better policy would, by 2030, mean:

  • 43% more renewable electricity capacity (267 gigawatts compared to 381 gigawatts).
  • 39% more carbon capture capacity installed (69 million tons of captured CO2 compared to 96 million).
  • 75% more electric cars sold (24 million versus 42 million).
  • Electric vehicles would have a 16% larger share of total vehicle sales (34% versus 50%).
69857940-20ee-43c6-ba75-15ce442d5ca9

Source: Rhodium Group

Without the BBB, it will be much harder for the U.S. to meet President Biden’s goal of halving U.S. emissions from 2005 levels by 2030, according to John Larsen, a partner with the Rhodium Group.

The group had found the BBB could get the U.S. as much as 50% of the way toward that goal, but that analysis looked at an earlier version of the bill, which included more stringent measures, notably a clean electricity performance program.

Even if specific goals are slipping further out of reach, climate change is the type of problem you should never stop trying to solve.

As the actor Humphrey Bogart is quoted having said, “things are never so bad they can’t be made worse.”

AND FINALLY...

Hydro heights

445d970b-30d3-4646-bb03-8a247fffe362

A Cipher reader shares this photo while working on a hydropower project in northern British Columbia, Canada. This is taken from the top of one of the six penstocks (intake structures that control water flow) as they go into the powerhouse of the plant.

Each week, we feature a photo that is somehow related to energy, the thing we all need but don’t notice until it’s expensive or gone. Email your ideas and photos to news@ciphernews.com.

cipher-logo-footer

You received this email because you signed-up for newsletters from Cipher.
Change your preferences or Unsubscribe here.

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up now to get Cipher in your inbox.

 

Cipher by Cipher by Breakthrough Energy
PO Box 563 
Kirkland, WA  98033
United States

 

FOLLOW US:

twitter-icon
linkedIn-icon
youtube-icon